10 Reasons Why I would Never Donate to a Major Charity (or, How to be a Superhero, Part 2).

“Giving to Charity” is another Myth we uphold fervently in the Great American Religion (just like “own a home”, or “send your kids to college”). Its time we stop blindly believing in mythology.

I’m not saying don’t give. I’m not saying don’t be spiritual or don’t be good. But do it with thoughtfulness, with true spirit, with a true desire to help. More harm than good is done when you blindly throw money at most charities.

When the first version of this article came out (How to be a Superhero…or why I would never donate to a major charity) I got a lot of criticism. So I’m going to answer some of the criticisms/questions that arose and I look forward to any comments, further suggestions.

(The American Religion trying to take your hard-earned money)

1. Be a Microcharity, part 2.

First off, my recommendation in the first article still holds. What I like to do is direct donation into what I call “micro-causes.” Specifically, pick up the local paper and see who needs help RIGHT NOW where a small amount of money can immediately make a significant difference in someone’s life.

In other words, be directly, personally involved with your cause. Then you know how the dollars are being used, you know face to face who is being helped, you feel good, you solve an immediate problem, you save a life.

You go from being an average guy to a superhero. Please check out the above article, as I describe the best ways to do this. For the next nine reasons I give specifics why I avoid the  major charities.

2. I already donate to thousands of major charities.

When you pay taxes, a good portion of the US budget goes towards funding philanthropic causes. I have no control over that money. Nor is that money always correctly allocated. So much corruption (not in our government but in others) has siphoned off that money. Nor do I always approve of the charities being donated to but I have no choice over it (other than a single vote out of 100,000,000).

But that’s fine. I can use #1 above to balance that off. I do have to say, though, that some of those charities the government has funded has worked. We eradicated smallpox throughout the world for instance. I feel pretty good about that. So if i can use my dollars to make more money for myself, and then pay more taxes, I don’t think its such a bad thing.

(while cancer rates rising, its harder than ever to get drugs through FDA)

3. I don’t like paying administrative overhead.

For instance, for every dollar that one donates to the American Cancer Society, 9.8 cents goes to administrative costs. I’m happy that people have jobs and are hired and I have nothing against the people that work for the ACS. But I bet if I use that money to start my own company (or, again, directly help people through my own micro-charity), then more people will have jobs and more people will get their problems solved. And the ACS is probably one of the best run major charities out there.

4) I don’t like paying marketing costs.

I didn’t realize this until I looked it up. But for every dollar I give to the American Cancer Society, 21.8 cents of that goes towards furthering their marketing efforts.

I thought I just gave them money? Now they need more money already? So only 70 cents of my dollar goes to actually helping the families with cancer.

5) There are better ways to cure cancer.

First off, it seems like I’m picking on the American Cancer Society. But this is the number one killer in the United States and one of the biggest killers out there so I might as well focus on it a little bit. And its not just cancer.

What I’m about to say applies to Alzheimers, Heart Disease, Cancer, and every major disease. Companies cure cancer. Scientists with new ideas of drugs team up with businessmen, start little companies, get approximately $200mm to $1bb in funding, then develop their drugs, put the drugs through a bunch of different phrases through the FDA, and then finally if the drugs are good, they get bought by a bigger company who is better at selling the drug. That’s how cancer gets cured. That’s how every disease in the world finds a cure now. So the best way to cure a major disease at least is to put money into a biotech mutual fund which funds small biotech companies.

These companies are at the frontier of major biotech research. The other thing is to lobby the government to reduce the FDA’s stringent standards on drugs. A drug costs up to $200 million or more to get through the FDA. The only way companies can recoup that cost is by charging enormous amounts for drugs.

This is part of the reason why healthcare and insurance are so expensive. Drugs for prostate cancer, for instance, cost up to $93,000 a month because the billion or so it cost to get through the Federal Drug Administration.

6) Its hard to uncover charity fraud.

The recent 60 Minutes expose on Greg Mortenson’s charity for building schools in Afganistan is a good example. I don’t know if this is a fraud or not. We may never know the full story.   I don’t want to know. But if it takes 60 Minutes to uncover something, using the best reporters out there, then how am I going to possibly be able to find out what’s fraud and what’s not.

7) Charities are businesses.

Businesses have agendas. The agenda of a charity is to convince you of a cause so that you feel concerned enough about it that you donate to that charity.

Example: there are many charities that try to do something about global warming. However, there is a lot of mixed evidence of global warming (this is not a debate about that but the recent scandals among scientist emails in UK are enough evidence to suggest that people often misstate the facts in order to promote agendas).

If people stopped donating to these charities, even if all the evidence suggests that their cause is meaningless, a lot of jobs would be lost. A lot of lives (the families of the people holding those jobs) would be hurt. That’s sad. But its not your responsibility to help them.  Many charities have causes that are unclear at best.  So best to avoid them.

8 ) High Unemployment.

With every dollar that I don’t save, I have two choices. Donate to a charity, or spend it. A charity is only obligated to spend a very small amount per year on actual charitable activity. The rest goes into funds that generate interest. They spend off of the interest.

When I spend a dollar in the economy, it instantly has its effect on jobs, growth, etc, particularly because of the “multiplier effect” (e.g. I buy a sandwich in a deli, the deli guy uses the dollar to buy a chair, the chair guy buys some books, the books guy buys a house, etc.

So each dollar spent s the equivalent of $10 spent on the economy. That has immediate effect in the quality of our lives: lower unemployment, greater demand for products, homes etc.

9) Smart Allocators of Capital are on the case.

Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are a 1000x better than I am at researching charitable cases, allocating their capital, investing correctly the leftover funds, etc. My $100 (or $1000, or $10,000, whatever) is not going to make a dent in their $100 billion.

Let them handle the big problems. With the micro-charity idea (see #1 above, and prior article, I personally can make a great difference to people who Bill Gates will never even hear about.

10) Give in every way you can possibly give.

Spend your time and efforts on proper giving. Too often, giving to charities is a way to pass on the personal giving responsibility to someone else. “I gave at the office”.

In addition to #1, please check out my post: Give and You Will Receive.  Its one of my first posts here and I truly believe and try to live by it. Giving of ourselves is the most important thing we can do in our lives, and the more you give, the more benefits you will.

So don’t give in order to receive those benefits, but give and then enjoy the benefits that will shower down. But the more personal the giving is, the greater the benefit.

Share This Post

Other posts you might be interested in: